<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dominic Sayers &#187; wired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dominicsayers.com/tag/wired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dominicsayers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://blog.dominicsayers.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>How organisations really work</title>
		<link>http://blog.dominicsayers.com/2008/08/06/how-organisations-really-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.dominicsayers.com/2008/08/06/how-organisations-really-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant to my work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominicsayers.wordpress.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin Waber has a grim piece of news for managers and CEOs: You&#8217;re out of the loop. - Wired magazine, 16 August 2008 This is something we all suspect about large organisations &#8211; unless you&#8217;re a senior manager in which case you probably think all valuable communication goes up and down the management hierarchy. Clive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em><strong>Benjamin Waber</strong> has a grim piece of news for managers and CEOs: You&#8217;re out of the loop.<br />
</em>- <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-08/st_thompson" target="_blank"><em>Wired</em> magazine</a>, 16 August 2008</p></blockquote>
<p>This is something we all suspect about large organisations &#8211; unless you&#8217;re a senior manager in which case you probably think all valuable communication goes up and down the management hierarchy. Clive Thompson&#8217;s short article in Wired makes me want to read the <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~bwaber/sensible.shtml" target="_blank">full MIT paper</a> by <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~bwaber/" target="_blank">Benjamin Waber</a> and his colleagues (how can I get a copy?).</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Almost every time he analyzes a group, Waber discovers that the super-connector — the crucial person who routes news among team members — isn&#8217;t the manager.<br />
</em>- ibid.</p></blockquote>
<p>The research team discovered this by putting location-aware badges on everybody and mapping how long they spent in proximity to each other. Using this information they could identify the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Molby" target="_blank">Jan Molby</a>s of the organisation &#8211; the midfielders who made and received the most passes. Information was flowing through the organisation in ad hoc patterns, enabled by these super-connectors. The data was good enough to predict when and where some of these exchanges would take place in the future &#8211; information that could be used to make sure the super-connectors were able to do their unofficial function more effectively.</p>
<p>I have worked in organisations where this data would be used to quash this sort of unofficial communication. Where is the cost-benefit analysis, managers would cry? How do we know these people aren&#8217;t simply gossiping? How can we keep them at their desks longer?</p>
<p>This is why the permanent use of such location-aware devices isn&#8217;t going to happen in any organisation I know. Such snooping would certainly be verboten by the Workers&#8217; Council in any German organisation. For every benefit to the organisation and its employees there is a potential Big Brother use too &#8211; what&#8217;s to stop the people in possession of the data from identifying people who spend too much time in the restrooms for example. There&#8217;s a trust issue, and if you&#8217;re in an organisation where the senior management is trusted then its communication channels are probably in a fairly healthy state too.</p>
<p>So the permanent use of location-aware badges is unlikely to happen in your organisation, but the knowledge gained from this experiment could be of lasting value. It might be possible to identify the super-connectors in your organisation without such intrusive monitoring. If you value their networking skills then you should find ways to support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.dominicsayers.com/2008/08/06/how-organisations-really-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
