Cycling to work – why people hate cyclists, part 2
-
Riding on pavements
-
Assaulting innocent pedestrians
- Wearing lycra
Riding on pavements
This is a complete no-no in my book. I would ride on a pavement about as often as I would drive a car on one, i.e. never. However, it is not unknown for cyclists to do this. There is an article in this week’s Time Out by a cyclist attempting to justify doing this regularly on her particular commute. Silly woman.
Cyclists who do this invade a space that is reserved for another class of road user. And by doing so they undermine all cycling campaigns aimed at getting such a space for cyclists themselves. Drivers who park (sometimes legally) in cycle lanes, road work contractors who block cycle lanes unnecessarily, planners who think 10 yards of cycle lane is worth installing so they can add to their cycle lane mileage for PR purposes: all these idiots are given succour by cyclists who ride on pavements.
Fortunately there aren’t many of them. No, really. It’s just that the ones who do are very, very noticeable. But the verdict is guilty anyway.
So we cyclists are 0 for 2. Guilty on the first two charges. Can we recover? See parts 3 and 4.
good post very interesting , but should we be hated as cyclists hate is a very strong word
have to agree.
they’re called sideWALKS for a reason. the only bicycle on a sidewalk should be pedaled by a 5-year-old child.
It’s me again. I actually was instructed by a police officer and a construction crew to ride on the sidewalk for my own safety during my commute on the only road (meaning no alternative route to take in this area) for a few stretch of miles between my home and office. There was literally no room for a cyclist in the space provisioned on the road due to curb to curb road construction. So what is to be done?
Rather than cycle on the sidewalk, I think I would assert my position as a vehicle entitled to use the road. If you cycle in the middle of the provisioned space as if you were a car then this avoids the sidewalk (if I understand the problem correctly).
If it’s 3 miles of construction and you are holding back a caravan of angry motorists then it’s not your fault – it’s the fault of whoever designed the construction project.
You are entitled to use the road.
I ride on the pavement but for medical reasons i only started riding 5 years ago{i am 20 now} and be it said i only ride single speed bmx bikes, but anyway i have balance problems and have been known in the past to suddenly lose balance it hasn’t happened now since i had my last bike when i was 15 but its safer for me and road users.
this said i do ride at a slow pace unless i have a long empty strech ahead of me and also i take care and if i have some peds coming my way i tend to be very carefully and considerate.
should i not be allowed to ride a bike at all?
I ride on pavement with amotorized schwinn bicycle.But,Where I live there Is only pavement and you get a fine for riding on sidewalks.I ride close to the curb and others can pass me easily.I run risk of hitting putholes,gouges,broken pavement,etc.etc.Roads need to be shared In a responsible manner by all.But,This Is not gonna be likely for some time.I think The answer to this Is to build bicycle lanes everywhere In the united states 5-10 feet away from the roads auto’s use.And If anyone breaks the law.Automobile or bike.Give em 20 years In prison.This would create jobs In america and keep me from having to worry about being killed coming home from work on my motorized bicycle trying to help myself to afford better In life and help my mother pay on her house mortgage without having to worry about angry redneck drunk drivers.We are both at fault,cyclists and automobile owners both.
Steve,How does riding on pavement make you or anyone else safer than riding on the sidewalk?And yes,You have a right to ride as much as anyone else.But,you endanger your life by doing this.But,I believe In free choice whether I agree or not with your choice or philosophy.Good luck with your health.